SunPowerPeek

Rhode Island vs South Dakota Solar Comparison

South Dakota gets more sun (4.6 hrs/day) while Rhode Island has the faster payback (6.5 years).Rhode Island offers higher 20-year savings at $48,600.

Rhode Island

3.8 hrs

6.5yr payback

$48,600

20yr savings

South Dakota

4.6 hrs

11.2yr payback

$26,200

20yr savings

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRhode IslandSouth Dakota
Peak Sun Hours3.8 hrs4.6 hrs
Cost per Watt$3.40$3.10
6kW System Cost$20,400$18,600
Federal Tax Credit30%30%
State Tax CreditNoneNone
State RebateNoneNone
Net MeteringFull Net MeteringPartial Net Metering
Electricity Rate28.08¢/kWh13.74¢/kWh
Payback Period6.5 years11.2 years
20-Year Savings$48,600$26,200

Verdict

Rhode Island is the better state for solar ROI with $48,600 in 20-year savings and a 6.5-year payback period. South Dakota has more sun exposure at 4.6 hrs/day, making it ideal for maximum energy production. Both states qualify for the 30% federal solar tax credit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is solar better in Rhode Island or South Dakota?

South Dakota gets more sun (4.6 peak hours/day vs 3.8). Rhode Island has a faster payback (6.5 years) and Rhode Island offers higher 20-year savings ($48,600).

How do solar costs compare between Rhode Island and South Dakota?

A 6kW system costs $20,400 in Rhode Island vs $18,600 in South Dakota before incentives. Both qualify for the 30% federal tax credit.

Explore More

Was this data helpful?

Data verified March 2026 · Source: NREL, DSIRE, EIA