North Dakota vs Washington Solar Comparison
North Dakota gets more sun (4.3 hrs/day) while North Dakota has the faster payback (12 years).North Dakota offers higher 20-year savings at $23,800.
North Dakota
4.3 hrs
12yr payback
$23,800
20yr savings
Washington
3.5 hrs
12.5yr payback
$22,800
20yr savings
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | North Dakota | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Sun Hours | 4.3 hrs | 3.5 hrs |
| Cost per Watt | $3.15 | $3.10 |
| 6kW System Cost | $18,900 | $18,600 |
| Federal Tax Credit | 30% | 30% |
| State Tax Credit | None | None |
| State Rebate | None | None |
| Net Metering | Partial Net Metering | Full Net Metering |
| Electricity Rate | 12.43¢/kWh | 11.26¢/kWh |
| Payback Period | 12 years | 12.5 years |
| 20-Year Savings | $23,800 | $22,800 |
Verdict
North Dakota is the better state for solar ROI with $23,800 in 20-year savings and a 12-year payback period. North Dakota has more sun exposure at 4.3 hrs/day, making it ideal for maximum energy production. Both states qualify for the 30% federal solar tax credit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is solar better in North Dakota or Washington?
North Dakota gets more sun (4.3 peak hours/day vs 3.5). North Dakota has a faster payback (12 years) and North Dakota offers higher 20-year savings ($23,800).
How do solar costs compare between North Dakota and Washington?
A 6kW system costs $18,900 in North Dakota vs $18,600 in Washington before incentives. Both qualify for the 30% federal tax credit.
Explore More
Was this data helpful?
Data verified March 2026 · Source: NREL, DSIRE, EIA