New Hampshire vs South Dakota Solar Comparison
South Dakota gets more sun (4.6 hrs/day) while New Hampshire has the faster payback (7.2 years).New Hampshire offers higher 20-year savings at $44,600.
New Hampshire
3.7 hrs
7.2yr payback
$44,600
20yr savings
South Dakota
4.6 hrs
11.2yr payback
$26,200
20yr savings
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | New Hampshire | South Dakota |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Sun Hours | 3.7 hrs | 4.6 hrs |
| Cost per Watt | $3.35 | $3.10 |
| 6kW System Cost | $20,100 | $18,600 |
| Federal Tax Credit | 30% | 30% |
| State Tax Credit | None | None |
| State Rebate | None | None |
| Net Metering | Full Net Metering | Partial Net Metering |
| Electricity Rate | 25.78¢/kWh | 13.74¢/kWh |
| Payback Period | 7.2 years | 11.2 years |
| 20-Year Savings | $44,600 | $26,200 |
Verdict
New Hampshire is the better state for solar ROI with $44,600 in 20-year savings and a 7.2-year payback period. South Dakota has more sun exposure at 4.6 hrs/day, making it ideal for maximum energy production. Both states qualify for the 30% federal solar tax credit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is solar better in New Hampshire or South Dakota?
South Dakota gets more sun (4.6 peak hours/day vs 3.7). New Hampshire has a faster payback (7.2 years) and New Hampshire offers higher 20-year savings ($44,600).
How do solar costs compare between New Hampshire and South Dakota?
A 6kW system costs $20,100 in New Hampshire vs $18,600 in South Dakota before incentives. Both qualify for the 30% federal tax credit.
Explore More
Was this data helpful?
Data verified March 2026 · Source: NREL, DSIRE, EIA