Nevada vs Wisconsin Solar Comparison
Nevada gets more sun (6.4 hrs/day) while Nevada has the faster payback (7 years).Nevada offers higher 20-year savings at $40,800.
Nevada
6.4 hrs
7yr payback
$40,800
20yr savings
Wisconsin
3.8 hrs
9.5yr payback
$30,400
20yr savings
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | Nevada | Wisconsin |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Sun Hours | 6.4 hrs | 3.8 hrs |
| Cost per Watt | $2.70 | $3.20 |
| 6kW System Cost | $16,200 | $19,200 |
| Federal Tax Credit | 30% | 30% |
| State Tax Credit | None | None |
| State Rebate | None | None |
| Net Metering | Full Net Metering | Full Net Metering |
| Electricity Rate | 14.92¢/kWh | 17.38¢/kWh |
| Payback Period | 7 years | 9.5 years |
| 20-Year Savings | $40,800 | $30,400 |
Verdict
Nevada is the better state for solar ROI with $40,800 in 20-year savings and a 7-year payback period. Nevada has more sun exposure at 6.4 hrs/day, making it ideal for maximum energy production. Both states qualify for the 30% federal solar tax credit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is solar better in Nevada or Wisconsin?
Nevada gets more sun (6.4 peak hours/day vs 3.8). Nevada has a faster payback (7 years) and Nevada offers higher 20-year savings ($40,800).
How do solar costs compare between Nevada and Wisconsin?
A 6kW system costs $16,200 in Nevada vs $19,200 in Wisconsin before incentives. Both qualify for the 30% federal tax credit.
Explore More
Was this data helpful?
Data verified March 2026 · Source: NREL, DSIRE, EIA