Montana vs Texas Solar Comparison
Texas gets more sun (5.3 hrs/day) while Texas has the faster payback (8 years).Texas offers higher 20-year savings at $38,400.
Montana
4.5 hrs
11.5yr payback
$24,200
20yr savings
Texas
5.3 hrs
8yr payback
$38,400
20yr savings
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | Montana | Texas |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Sun Hours | 4.5 hrs | 5.3 hrs |
| Cost per Watt | $3.10 | $2.80 |
| 6kW System Cost | $18,600 | $16,800 |
| Federal Tax Credit | 30% | 30% |
| State Tax Credit | None | None |
| State Rebate | None | None |
| Net Metering | Full Net Metering | Partial Net Metering |
| Electricity Rate | 12.81¢/kWh | 15.06¢/kWh |
| Payback Period | 11.5 years | 8 years |
| 20-Year Savings | $24,200 | $38,400 |
Verdict
Texas is the better state for solar ROI with $38,400 in 20-year savings and a 8-year payback period. Texas has more sun exposure at 5.3 hrs/day, making it ideal for maximum energy production. Both states qualify for the 30% federal solar tax credit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is solar better in Montana or Texas?
Texas gets more sun (5.3 peak hours/day vs 4.5). Texas has a faster payback (8 years) and Texas offers higher 20-year savings ($38,400).
How do solar costs compare between Montana and Texas?
A 6kW system costs $18,600 in Montana vs $16,800 in Texas before incentives. Both qualify for the 30% federal tax credit.
Explore More
Was this data helpful?
Data verified March 2026 · Source: NREL, DSIRE, EIA