Montana vs Tennessee Solar Comparison
Montana gets more sun (4.5 hrs/day) while Montana has the faster payback (11.5 years).Tennessee offers higher 20-year savings at $26,400.
Montana
4.5 hrs
11.5yr payback
$24,200
20yr savings
Tennessee
4.3 hrs
11.5yr payback
$26,400
20yr savings
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | Montana | Tennessee |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Sun Hours | 4.5 hrs | 4.3 hrs |
| Cost per Watt | $3.10 | $3.00 |
| 6kW System Cost | $18,600 | $18,000 |
| Federal Tax Credit | 30% | 30% |
| State Tax Credit | None | None |
| State Rebate | None | None |
| Net Metering | Full Net Metering | No Net Metering |
| Electricity Rate | 12.81¢/kWh | 12.91¢/kWh |
| Payback Period | 11.5 years | 11.5 years |
| 20-Year Savings | $24,200 | $26,400 |
Verdict
Tennessee is the better state for solar ROI with $26,400 in 20-year savings and a 11.5-year payback period. Montana has more sun exposure at 4.5 hrs/day, making it ideal for maximum energy production. Both states qualify for the 30% federal solar tax credit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is solar better in Montana or Tennessee?
Montana gets more sun (4.5 peak hours/day vs 4.3). Montana has a faster payback (11.5 years) and Tennessee offers higher 20-year savings ($26,400).
How do solar costs compare between Montana and Tennessee?
A 6kW system costs $18,600 in Montana vs $18,000 in Tennessee before incentives. Both qualify for the 30% federal tax credit.
Explore More
Was this data helpful?
Data verified March 2026 · Source: NREL, DSIRE, EIA