Montana vs Oregon Solar Comparison
Montana gets more sun (4.5 hrs/day) while Oregon has the faster payback (10.8 years).Oregon offers higher 20-year savings at $26,200.
Montana
4.5 hrs
11.5yr payback
$24,200
20yr savings
Oregon
4.0 hrs
10.8yr payback
$26,200
20yr savings
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | Montana | Oregon |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Sun Hours | 4.5 hrs | 4.0 hrs |
| Cost per Watt | $3.10 | $3.05 |
| 6kW System Cost | $18,600 | $18,300 |
| Federal Tax Credit | 30% | 30% |
| State Tax Credit | None | None |
| State Rebate | None | None |
| Net Metering | Full Net Metering | Full Net Metering |
| Electricity Rate | 12.81¢/kWh | 12.55¢/kWh |
| Payback Period | 11.5 years | 10.8 years |
| 20-Year Savings | $24,200 | $26,200 |
Verdict
Oregon is the better state for solar ROI with $26,200 in 20-year savings and a 10.8-year payback period. Montana has more sun exposure at 4.5 hrs/day, making it ideal for maximum energy production. Both states qualify for the 30% federal solar tax credit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is solar better in Montana or Oregon?
Montana gets more sun (4.5 peak hours/day vs 4). Oregon has a faster payback (10.8 years) and Oregon offers higher 20-year savings ($26,200).
How do solar costs compare between Montana and Oregon?
A 6kW system costs $18,600 in Montana vs $18,300 in Oregon before incentives. Both qualify for the 30% federal tax credit.
Explore More
Was this data helpful?
Data verified March 2026 · Source: NREL, DSIRE, EIA