Montana vs North Dakota Solar Comparison
Montana gets more sun (4.5 hrs/day) while Montana has the faster payback (11.5 years).Montana offers higher 20-year savings at $24,200.
Montana
4.5 hrs
11.5yr payback
$24,200
20yr savings
North Dakota
4.3 hrs
12yr payback
$23,800
20yr savings
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | Montana | North Dakota |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Sun Hours | 4.5 hrs | 4.3 hrs |
| Cost per Watt | $3.10 | $3.15 |
| 6kW System Cost | $18,600 | $18,900 |
| Federal Tax Credit | 30% | 30% |
| State Tax Credit | None | None |
| State Rebate | None | None |
| Net Metering | Full Net Metering | Partial Net Metering |
| Electricity Rate | 12.81¢/kWh | 12.43¢/kWh |
| Payback Period | 11.5 years | 12 years |
| 20-Year Savings | $24,200 | $23,800 |
Verdict
Montana is the better state for solar ROI with $24,200 in 20-year savings and a 11.5-year payback period. Montana has more sun exposure at 4.5 hrs/day, making it ideal for maximum energy production. Both states qualify for the 30% federal solar tax credit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is solar better in Montana or North Dakota?
Montana gets more sun (4.5 peak hours/day vs 4.3). Montana has a faster payback (11.5 years) and Montana offers higher 20-year savings ($24,200).
How do solar costs compare between Montana and North Dakota?
A 6kW system costs $18,600 in Montana vs $18,900 in North Dakota before incentives. Both qualify for the 30% federal tax credit.
Explore More
Was this data helpful?
Data verified March 2026 · Source: NREL, DSIRE, EIA