Montana vs New Hampshire Solar Comparison
Montana gets more sun (4.5 hrs/day) while New Hampshire has the faster payback (7.2 years).New Hampshire offers higher 20-year savings at $44,600.
Montana
4.5 hrs
11.5yr payback
$24,200
20yr savings
New Hampshire
3.7 hrs
7.2yr payback
$44,600
20yr savings
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | Montana | New Hampshire |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Sun Hours | 4.5 hrs | 3.7 hrs |
| Cost per Watt | $3.10 | $3.35 |
| 6kW System Cost | $18,600 | $20,100 |
| Federal Tax Credit | 30% | 30% |
| State Tax Credit | None | None |
| State Rebate | None | None |
| Net Metering | Full Net Metering | Full Net Metering |
| Electricity Rate | 12.81¢/kWh | 25.78¢/kWh |
| Payback Period | 11.5 years | 7.2 years |
| 20-Year Savings | $24,200 | $44,600 |
Verdict
New Hampshire is the better state for solar ROI with $44,600 in 20-year savings and a 7.2-year payback period. Montana has more sun exposure at 4.5 hrs/day, making it ideal for maximum energy production. Both states qualify for the 30% federal solar tax credit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is solar better in Montana or New Hampshire?
Montana gets more sun (4.5 peak hours/day vs 3.7). New Hampshire has a faster payback (7.2 years) and New Hampshire offers higher 20-year savings ($44,600).
How do solar costs compare between Montana and New Hampshire?
A 6kW system costs $18,600 in Montana vs $20,100 in New Hampshire before incentives. Both qualify for the 30% federal tax credit.
Explore More
Was this data helpful?
Data verified March 2026 · Source: NREL, DSIRE, EIA