Missouri vs Oklahoma Solar Comparison
Oklahoma gets more sun (5.1 hrs/day) while Oklahoma has the faster payback (10.5 years).Oklahoma offers higher 20-year savings at $28,400.
Missouri
4.4 hrs
10.8yr payback
$28,000
20yr savings
Oklahoma
5.1 hrs
10.5yr payback
$28,400
20yr savings
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | Missouri | Oklahoma |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Sun Hours | 4.4 hrs | 5.1 hrs |
| Cost per Watt | $3.05 | $2.95 |
| 6kW System Cost | $18,300 | $17,700 |
| Federal Tax Credit | 30% | 30% |
| State Tax Credit | None | None |
| State Rebate | None | None |
| Net Metering | Full Net Metering | Partial Net Metering |
| Electricity Rate | 13.78¢/kWh | 12.82¢/kWh |
| Payback Period | 10.8 years | 10.5 years |
| 20-Year Savings | $28,000 | $28,400 |
Verdict
Oklahoma is the better state for solar ROI with $28,400 in 20-year savings and a 10.5-year payback period. Oklahoma has more sun exposure at 5.1 hrs/day, making it ideal for maximum energy production. Both states qualify for the 30% federal solar tax credit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is solar better in Missouri or Oklahoma?
Oklahoma gets more sun (5.1 peak hours/day vs 4.4). Oklahoma has a faster payback (10.5 years) and Oklahoma offers higher 20-year savings ($28,400).
How do solar costs compare between Missouri and Oklahoma?
A 6kW system costs $18,300 in Missouri vs $17,700 in Oklahoma before incentives. Both qualify for the 30% federal tax credit.
Explore More
Was this data helpful?
Data verified March 2026 · Source: NREL, DSIRE, EIA