Missouri vs North Dakota Solar Comparison
Missouri gets more sun (4.4 hrs/day) while Missouri has the faster payback (10.8 years).Missouri offers higher 20-year savings at $28,000.
Missouri
4.4 hrs
10.8yr payback
$28,000
20yr savings
North Dakota
4.3 hrs
12yr payback
$23,800
20yr savings
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | Missouri | North Dakota |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Sun Hours | 4.4 hrs | 4.3 hrs |
| Cost per Watt | $3.05 | $3.15 |
| 6kW System Cost | $18,300 | $18,900 |
| Federal Tax Credit | 30% | 30% |
| State Tax Credit | None | None |
| State Rebate | None | None |
| Net Metering | Full Net Metering | Partial Net Metering |
| Electricity Rate | 13.78¢/kWh | 12.43¢/kWh |
| Payback Period | 10.8 years | 12 years |
| 20-Year Savings | $28,000 | $23,800 |
Verdict
Missouri is the better state for solar ROI with $28,000 in 20-year savings and a 10.8-year payback period. Missouri has more sun exposure at 4.4 hrs/day, making it ideal for maximum energy production. Both states qualify for the 30% federal solar tax credit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is solar better in Missouri or North Dakota?
Missouri gets more sun (4.4 peak hours/day vs 4.3). Missouri has a faster payback (10.8 years) and Missouri offers higher 20-year savings ($28,000).
How do solar costs compare between Missouri and North Dakota?
A 6kW system costs $18,300 in Missouri vs $18,900 in North Dakota before incentives. Both qualify for the 30% federal tax credit.
Explore More
Was this data helpful?
Data verified March 2026 · Source: NREL, DSIRE, EIA