Mississippi vs North Dakota Solar Comparison
Mississippi gets more sun (4.7 hrs/day) while Mississippi has the faster payback (11 years).Mississippi offers higher 20-year savings at $27,200.
Mississippi
4.7 hrs
11yr payback
$27,200
20yr savings
North Dakota
4.3 hrs
12yr payback
$23,800
20yr savings
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | Mississippi | North Dakota |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Sun Hours | 4.7 hrs | 4.3 hrs |
| Cost per Watt | $3.00 | $3.15 |
| 6kW System Cost | $18,000 | $18,900 |
| Federal Tax Credit | 30% | 30% |
| State Tax Credit | None | None |
| State Rebate | None | None |
| Net Metering | Partial Net Metering | Partial Net Metering |
| Electricity Rate | 13.54¢/kWh | 12.43¢/kWh |
| Payback Period | 11 years | 12 years |
| 20-Year Savings | $27,200 | $23,800 |
Verdict
Mississippi is the better state for solar ROI with $27,200 in 20-year savings and a 11-year payback period. Mississippi has more sun exposure at 4.7 hrs/day, making it ideal for maximum energy production. Both states qualify for the 30% federal solar tax credit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is solar better in Mississippi or North Dakota?
Mississippi gets more sun (4.7 peak hours/day vs 4.3). Mississippi has a faster payback (11 years) and Mississippi offers higher 20-year savings ($27,200).
How do solar costs compare between Mississippi and North Dakota?
A 6kW system costs $18,000 in Mississippi vs $18,900 in North Dakota before incentives. Both qualify for the 30% federal tax credit.
Explore More
Was this data helpful?
Data verified March 2026 · Source: NREL, DSIRE, EIA