Minnesota vs North Carolina Solar Comparison
North Carolina gets more sun (4.6 hrs/day) while North Carolina has the faster payback (9.8 years).North Carolina offers higher 20-year savings at $31,400.
Minnesota
4.0 hrs
10yr payback
$28,800
20yr savings
North Carolina
4.6 hrs
9.8yr payback
$31,400
20yr savings
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | Minnesota | North Carolina |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Sun Hours | 4.0 hrs | 4.6 hrs |
| Cost per Watt | $3.15 | $2.85 |
| 6kW System Cost | $18,900 | $17,100 |
| Federal Tax Credit | 30% | 30% |
| State Tax Credit | None | None |
| State Rebate | None | None |
| Net Metering | Full Net Metering | Full Net Metering |
| Electricity Rate | 15.63¢/kWh | 14.09¢/kWh |
| Payback Period | 10 years | 9.8 years |
| 20-Year Savings | $28,800 | $31,400 |
Verdict
North Carolina is the better state for solar ROI with $31,400 in 20-year savings and a 9.8-year payback period. North Carolina has more sun exposure at 4.6 hrs/day, making it ideal for maximum energy production. Both states qualify for the 30% federal solar tax credit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is solar better in Minnesota or North Carolina?
North Carolina gets more sun (4.6 peak hours/day vs 4). North Carolina has a faster payback (9.8 years) and North Carolina offers higher 20-year savings ($31,400).
How do solar costs compare between Minnesota and North Carolina?
A 6kW system costs $18,900 in Minnesota vs $17,100 in North Carolina before incentives. Both qualify for the 30% federal tax credit.
Explore More
Was this data helpful?
Data verified March 2026 · Source: NREL, DSIRE, EIA