Michigan vs North Dakota Solar Comparison
North Dakota gets more sun (4.3 hrs/day) while Michigan has the faster payback (9.5 years).Michigan offers higher 20-year savings at $30,600.
Michigan
3.6 hrs
9.5yr payback
$30,600
20yr savings
North Dakota
4.3 hrs
12yr payback
$23,800
20yr savings
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | Michigan | North Dakota |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Sun Hours | 3.6 hrs | 4.3 hrs |
| Cost per Watt | $3.20 | $3.15 |
| 6kW System Cost | $19,200 | $18,900 |
| Federal Tax Credit | 30% | 30% |
| State Tax Credit | None | None |
| State Rebate | None | None |
| Net Metering | Full Net Metering | Partial Net Metering |
| Electricity Rate | 19.34¢/kWh | 12.43¢/kWh |
| Payback Period | 9.5 years | 12 years |
| 20-Year Savings | $30,600 | $23,800 |
Verdict
Michigan is the better state for solar ROI with $30,600 in 20-year savings and a 9.5-year payback period. North Dakota has more sun exposure at 4.3 hrs/day, making it ideal for maximum energy production. Both states qualify for the 30% federal solar tax credit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is solar better in Michigan or North Dakota?
North Dakota gets more sun (4.3 peak hours/day vs 3.6). Michigan has a faster payback (9.5 years) and Michigan offers higher 20-year savings ($30,600).
How do solar costs compare between Michigan and North Dakota?
A 6kW system costs $19,200 in Michigan vs $18,900 in North Dakota before incentives. Both qualify for the 30% federal tax credit.
Explore More
Was this data helpful?
Data verified March 2026 · Source: NREL, DSIRE, EIA