Kentucky vs North Dakota Solar Comparison
North Dakota gets more sun (4.3 hrs/day) while Kentucky has the faster payback (12 years).Kentucky offers higher 20-year savings at $24,600.
Kentucky
4.1 hrs
12yr payback
$24,600
20yr savings
North Dakota
4.3 hrs
12yr payback
$23,800
20yr savings
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | Kentucky | North Dakota |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Sun Hours | 4.1 hrs | 4.3 hrs |
| Cost per Watt | $3.05 | $3.15 |
| 6kW System Cost | $18,300 | $18,900 |
| Federal Tax Credit | 30% | 30% |
| State Tax Credit | None | None |
| State Rebate | None | None |
| Net Metering | No Net Metering | Partial Net Metering |
| Electricity Rate | 13.19¢/kWh | 12.43¢/kWh |
| Payback Period | 12 years | 12 years |
| 20-Year Savings | $24,600 | $23,800 |
Verdict
Kentucky is the better state for solar ROI with $24,600 in 20-year savings and a 12-year payback period. North Dakota has more sun exposure at 4.3 hrs/day, making it ideal for maximum energy production. Both states qualify for the 30% federal solar tax credit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is solar better in Kentucky or North Dakota?
North Dakota gets more sun (4.3 peak hours/day vs 4.1). Kentucky has a faster payback (12 years) and Kentucky offers higher 20-year savings ($24,600).
How do solar costs compare between Kentucky and North Dakota?
A 6kW system costs $18,300 in Kentucky vs $18,900 in North Dakota before incentives. Both qualify for the 30% federal tax credit.
Explore More
Was this data helpful?
Data verified March 2026 · Source: NREL, DSIRE, EIA