Indiana vs New Hampshire Solar Comparison
Indiana gets more sun (4.0 hrs/day) while New Hampshire has the faster payback (7.2 years).New Hampshire offers higher 20-year savings at $44,600.
Indiana
4.0 hrs
10yr payback
$29,200
20yr savings
New Hampshire
3.7 hrs
7.2yr payback
$44,600
20yr savings
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | Indiana | New Hampshire |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Sun Hours | 4.0 hrs | 3.7 hrs |
| Cost per Watt | $3.10 | $3.35 |
| 6kW System Cost | $18,600 | $20,100 |
| Federal Tax Credit | 30% | 30% |
| State Tax Credit | None | None |
| State Rebate | None | None |
| Net Metering | Partial Net Metering | Full Net Metering |
| Electricity Rate | 15.42¢/kWh | 25.78¢/kWh |
| Payback Period | 10 years | 7.2 years |
| 20-Year Savings | $29,200 | $44,600 |
Verdict
New Hampshire is the better state for solar ROI with $44,600 in 20-year savings and a 7.2-year payback period. Indiana has more sun exposure at 4.0 hrs/day, making it ideal for maximum energy production. Both states qualify for the 30% federal solar tax credit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is solar better in Indiana or New Hampshire?
Indiana gets more sun (4 peak hours/day vs 3.7). New Hampshire has a faster payback (7.2 years) and New Hampshire offers higher 20-year savings ($44,600).
How do solar costs compare between Indiana and New Hampshire?
A 6kW system costs $18,600 in Indiana vs $20,100 in New Hampshire before incentives. Both qualify for the 30% federal tax credit.
Explore More
Was this data helpful?
Data verified March 2026 · Source: NREL, DSIRE, EIA