Indiana vs Montana Solar Comparison
Montana gets more sun (4.5 hrs/day) while Indiana has the faster payback (10 years).Indiana offers higher 20-year savings at $29,200.
Indiana
4.0 hrs
10yr payback
$29,200
20yr savings
Montana
4.5 hrs
11.5yr payback
$24,200
20yr savings
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | Indiana | Montana |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Sun Hours | 4.0 hrs | 4.5 hrs |
| Cost per Watt | $3.10 | $3.10 |
| 6kW System Cost | $18,600 | $18,600 |
| Federal Tax Credit | 30% | 30% |
| State Tax Credit | None | None |
| State Rebate | None | None |
| Net Metering | Partial Net Metering | Full Net Metering |
| Electricity Rate | 15.42¢/kWh | 12.81¢/kWh |
| Payback Period | 10 years | 11.5 years |
| 20-Year Savings | $29,200 | $24,200 |
Verdict
Indiana is the better state for solar ROI with $29,200 in 20-year savings and a 10-year payback period. Montana has more sun exposure at 4.5 hrs/day, making it ideal for maximum energy production. Both states qualify for the 30% federal solar tax credit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is solar better in Indiana or Montana?
Montana gets more sun (4.5 peak hours/day vs 4). Indiana has a faster payback (10 years) and Indiana offers higher 20-year savings ($29,200).
How do solar costs compare between Indiana and Montana?
A 6kW system costs $18,600 in Indiana vs $18,600 in Montana before incentives. Both qualify for the 30% federal tax credit.
Explore More
Was this data helpful?
Data verified March 2026 · Source: NREL, DSIRE, EIA