Illinois vs Oklahoma Solar Comparison
Oklahoma gets more sun (5.1 hrs/day) while Illinois has the faster payback (9 years).Illinois offers higher 20-year savings at $32,600.
Illinois
4.0 hrs
9yr payback
$32,600
20yr savings
Oklahoma
5.1 hrs
10.5yr payback
$28,400
20yr savings
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | Illinois | Oklahoma |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Sun Hours | 4.0 hrs | 5.1 hrs |
| Cost per Watt | $3.15 | $2.95 |
| 6kW System Cost | $18,900 | $17,700 |
| Federal Tax Credit | 30% | 30% |
| State Tax Credit | None | None |
| State Rebate | None | None |
| Net Metering | Full Net Metering | Partial Net Metering |
| Electricity Rate | 16.27¢/kWh | 12.82¢/kWh |
| Payback Period | 9 years | 10.5 years |
| 20-Year Savings | $32,600 | $28,400 |
Verdict
Illinois is the better state for solar ROI with $32,600 in 20-year savings and a 9-year payback period. Oklahoma has more sun exposure at 5.1 hrs/day, making it ideal for maximum energy production. Both states qualify for the 30% federal solar tax credit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is solar better in Illinois or Oklahoma?
Oklahoma gets more sun (5.1 peak hours/day vs 4). Illinois has a faster payback (9 years) and Illinois offers higher 20-year savings ($32,600).
How do solar costs compare between Illinois and Oklahoma?
A 6kW system costs $18,900 in Illinois vs $17,700 in Oklahoma before incentives. Both qualify for the 30% federal tax credit.
Explore More
Was this data helpful?
Data verified March 2026 · Source: NREL, DSIRE, EIA