Idaho vs North Dakota Solar Comparison
Idaho gets more sun (4.7 hrs/day) while North Dakota has the faster payback (12 years).North Dakota offers higher 20-year savings at $23,800.
Idaho
4.7 hrs
12.5yr payback
$22,400
20yr savings
North Dakota
4.3 hrs
12yr payback
$23,800
20yr savings
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | Idaho | North Dakota |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Sun Hours | 4.7 hrs | 4.3 hrs |
| Cost per Watt | $3.00 | $3.15 |
| 6kW System Cost | $18,000 | $18,900 |
| Federal Tax Credit | 30% | 30% |
| State Tax Credit | None | None |
| State Rebate | None | None |
| Net Metering | Full Net Metering | Partial Net Metering |
| Electricity Rate | 11.15¢/kWh | 12.43¢/kWh |
| Payback Period | 12.5 years | 12 years |
| 20-Year Savings | $22,400 | $23,800 |
Verdict
North Dakota is the better state for solar ROI with $23,800 in 20-year savings and a 12-year payback period. Idaho has more sun exposure at 4.7 hrs/day, making it ideal for maximum energy production. Both states qualify for the 30% federal solar tax credit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is solar better in Idaho or North Dakota?
Idaho gets more sun (4.7 peak hours/day vs 4.3). North Dakota has a faster payback (12 years) and North Dakota offers higher 20-year savings ($23,800).
How do solar costs compare between Idaho and North Dakota?
A 6kW system costs $18,000 in Idaho vs $18,900 in North Dakota before incentives. Both qualify for the 30% federal tax credit.
Explore More
Was this data helpful?
Data verified March 2026 · Source: NREL, DSIRE, EIA