Connecticut vs North Dakota Solar Comparison
North Dakota gets more sun (4.3 hrs/day) while Connecticut has the faster payback (6.2 years).Connecticut offers higher 20-year savings at $52,400.
Connecticut
3.8 hrs
6.2yr payback
$52,400
20yr savings
North Dakota
4.3 hrs
12yr payback
$23,800
20yr savings
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | Connecticut | North Dakota |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Sun Hours | 3.8 hrs | 4.3 hrs |
| Cost per Watt | $3.45 | $3.15 |
| 6kW System Cost | $20,700 | $18,900 |
| Federal Tax Credit | 30% | 30% |
| State Tax Credit | None | None |
| State Rebate | None | None |
| Net Metering | Full Net Metering | Partial Net Metering |
| Electricity Rate | 29.98¢/kWh | 12.43¢/kWh |
| Payback Period | 6.2 years | 12 years |
| 20-Year Savings | $52,400 | $23,800 |
Verdict
Connecticut is the better state for solar ROI with $52,400 in 20-year savings and a 6.2-year payback period. North Dakota has more sun exposure at 4.3 hrs/day, making it ideal for maximum energy production. Both states qualify for the 30% federal solar tax credit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is solar better in Connecticut or North Dakota?
North Dakota gets more sun (4.3 peak hours/day vs 3.8). Connecticut has a faster payback (6.2 years) and Connecticut offers higher 20-year savings ($52,400).
How do solar costs compare between Connecticut and North Dakota?
A 6kW system costs $20,700 in Connecticut vs $18,900 in North Dakota before incentives. Both qualify for the 30% federal tax credit.
Explore More
Was this data helpful?
Data verified March 2026 · Source: NREL, DSIRE, EIA