Arkansas vs Illinois Solar Comparison
Arkansas gets more sun (4.6 hrs/day) while Illinois has the faster payback (9 years).Illinois offers higher 20-year savings at $32,600.
Arkansas
4.6 hrs
11.5yr payback
$25,600
20yr savings
Illinois
4.0 hrs
9yr payback
$32,600
20yr savings
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | Arkansas | Illinois |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Sun Hours | 4.6 hrs | 4.0 hrs |
| Cost per Watt | $3.10 | $3.15 |
| 6kW System Cost | $18,600 | $18,900 |
| Federal Tax Credit | 30% | 30% |
| State Tax Credit | None | None |
| State Rebate | None | None |
| Net Metering | Full Net Metering | Full Net Metering |
| Electricity Rate | 13.04¢/kWh | 16.27¢/kWh |
| Payback Period | 11.5 years | 9 years |
| 20-Year Savings | $25,600 | $32,600 |
Verdict
Illinois is the better state for solar ROI with $32,600 in 20-year savings and a 9-year payback period. Arkansas has more sun exposure at 4.6 hrs/day, making it ideal for maximum energy production. Both states qualify for the 30% federal solar tax credit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is solar better in Arkansas or Illinois?
Arkansas gets more sun (4.6 peak hours/day vs 4). Illinois has a faster payback (9 years) and Illinois offers higher 20-year savings ($32,600).
How do solar costs compare between Arkansas and Illinois?
A 6kW system costs $18,600 in Arkansas vs $18,900 in Illinois before incentives. Both qualify for the 30% federal tax credit.
Explore More
Was this data helpful?
Data verified March 2026 · Source: NREL, DSIRE, EIA