Alaska vs Utah Solar Comparison
Utah gets more sun (5.6 hrs/day) while Utah has the faster payback (10 years).Utah offers higher 20-year savings at $28,600.
Alaska
3.0 hrs
10.5yr payback
$22,800
20yr savings
Utah
5.6 hrs
10yr payback
$28,600
20yr savings
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | Alaska | Utah |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Sun Hours | 3.0 hrs | 5.6 hrs |
| Cost per Watt | $3.20 | $2.85 |
| 6kW System Cost | $19,200 | $17,100 |
| Federal Tax Credit | 30% | 30% |
| State Tax Credit | None | None |
| State Rebate | None | None |
| Net Metering | Full Net Metering | Full Net Metering |
| Electricity Rate | 24.21¢/kWh | 11.41¢/kWh |
| Payback Period | 10.5 years | 10 years |
| 20-Year Savings | $22,800 | $28,600 |
Verdict
Utah is the better state for solar ROI with $28,600 in 20-year savings and a 10-year payback period. Utah has more sun exposure at 5.6 hrs/day, making it ideal for maximum energy production. Both states qualify for the 30% federal solar tax credit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is solar better in Alaska or Utah?
Utah gets more sun (5.6 peak hours/day vs 3). Utah has a faster payback (10 years) and Utah offers higher 20-year savings ($28,600).
How do solar costs compare between Alaska and Utah?
A 6kW system costs $19,200 in Alaska vs $17,100 in Utah before incentives. Both qualify for the 30% federal tax credit.
Explore More
Was this data helpful?
Data verified March 2026 · Source: NREL, DSIRE, EIA