Alaska vs Massachusetts Solar Comparison
Massachusetts gets more sun (3.8 hrs/day) while Massachusetts has the faster payback (6 years).Massachusetts offers higher 20-year savings at $54,800.
Alaska
3.0 hrs
10.5yr payback
$22,800
20yr savings
Massachusetts
3.8 hrs
6yr payback
$54,800
20yr savings
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | Alaska | Massachusetts |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Sun Hours | 3.0 hrs | 3.8 hrs |
| Cost per Watt | $3.20 | $3.40 |
| 6kW System Cost | $19,200 | $20,400 |
| Federal Tax Credit | 30% | 30% |
| State Tax Credit | None | 15% |
| State Rebate | None | $1,000 |
| Net Metering | Full Net Metering | Full Net Metering |
| Electricity Rate | 24.21¢/kWh | 28.58¢/kWh |
| Payback Period | 10.5 years | 6 years |
| 20-Year Savings | $22,800 | $54,800 |
Verdict
Massachusetts is the better state for solar ROI with $54,800 in 20-year savings and a 6-year payback period. Massachusetts has more sun exposure at 3.8 hrs/day, making it ideal for maximum energy production. Both states qualify for the 30% federal solar tax credit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is solar better in Alaska or Massachusetts?
Massachusetts gets more sun (3.8 peak hours/day vs 3). Massachusetts has a faster payback (6 years) and Massachusetts offers higher 20-year savings ($54,800).
How do solar costs compare between Alaska and Massachusetts?
A 6kW system costs $19,200 in Alaska vs $20,400 in Massachusetts before incentives. Both qualify for the 30% federal tax credit.
Explore More
Was this data helpful?
Data verified March 2026 · Source: NREL, DSIRE, EIA