Alaska vs Connecticut Solar Comparison
Connecticut gets more sun (3.8 hrs/day) while Connecticut has the faster payback (6.2 years).Connecticut offers higher 20-year savings at $52,400.
Alaska
3.0 hrs
10.5yr payback
$22,800
20yr savings
Connecticut
3.8 hrs
6.2yr payback
$52,400
20yr savings
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | Alaska | Connecticut |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Sun Hours | 3.0 hrs | 3.8 hrs |
| Cost per Watt | $3.20 | $3.45 |
| 6kW System Cost | $19,200 | $20,700 |
| Federal Tax Credit | 30% | 30% |
| State Tax Credit | None | None |
| State Rebate | None | None |
| Net Metering | Full Net Metering | Full Net Metering |
| Electricity Rate | 24.21¢/kWh | 29.98¢/kWh |
| Payback Period | 10.5 years | 6.2 years |
| 20-Year Savings | $22,800 | $52,400 |
Verdict
Connecticut is the better state for solar ROI with $52,400 in 20-year savings and a 6.2-year payback period. Connecticut has more sun exposure at 3.8 hrs/day, making it ideal for maximum energy production. Both states qualify for the 30% federal solar tax credit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is solar better in Alaska or Connecticut?
Connecticut gets more sun (3.8 peak hours/day vs 3). Connecticut has a faster payback (6.2 years) and Connecticut offers higher 20-year savings ($52,400).
How do solar costs compare between Alaska and Connecticut?
A 6kW system costs $19,200 in Alaska vs $20,700 in Connecticut before incentives. Both qualify for the 30% federal tax credit.
Explore More
Was this data helpful?
Data verified March 2026 · Source: NREL, DSIRE, EIA