Alabama vs Minnesota Solar Comparison
Alabama gets more sun (4.5 hrs/day) while Minnesota has the faster payback (10 years).Minnesota offers higher 20-year savings at $28,800.
Alabama
4.5 hrs
11.2yr payback
$28,400
20yr savings
Minnesota
4.0 hrs
10yr payback
$28,800
20yr savings
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | Alabama | Minnesota |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Sun Hours | 4.5 hrs | 4.0 hrs |
| Cost per Watt | $2.95 | $3.15 |
| 6kW System Cost | $17,700 | $18,900 |
| Federal Tax Credit | 30% | 30% |
| State Tax Credit | None | None |
| State Rebate | None | None |
| Net Metering | Partial Net Metering | Full Net Metering |
| Electricity Rate | 14.87¢/kWh | 15.63¢/kWh |
| Payback Period | 11.2 years | 10 years |
| 20-Year Savings | $28,400 | $28,800 |
Verdict
Minnesota is the better state for solar ROI with $28,800 in 20-year savings and a 10-year payback period. Alabama has more sun exposure at 4.5 hrs/day, making it ideal for maximum energy production. Both states qualify for the 30% federal solar tax credit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is solar better in Alabama or Minnesota?
Alabama gets more sun (4.5 peak hours/day vs 4). Minnesota has a faster payback (10 years) and Minnesota offers higher 20-year savings ($28,800).
How do solar costs compare between Alabama and Minnesota?
A 6kW system costs $17,700 in Alabama vs $18,900 in Minnesota before incentives. Both qualify for the 30% federal tax credit.
Explore More
Was this data helpful?
Data verified March 2026 · Source: NREL, DSIRE, EIA